| 11-Jul-07 01:10
riostrioff | | | under certain circumstances, 4-3-1-2 could be offensively modified into 3-4-1-2 by bringing one wingback into wing midfield position.
jose pekerman did it with Argentina national team in 06 WC |
| | |
|
| 02-Apr-08 21:00
guest 206.188.133.165 | | | With this formation you suppply much needed defensive suppo\\rt with the two defensive centre midfielders and cover the flanks with the wingers to deliver a good cross. This formation was used by Saltus Grammar school 2006-2007 season. They won the league that year in over thirteens and reached the semifinals but in under 13 they won the cup and came second in the league. This formation only works if at least one of the centre midfielders is like the sweeper of the midfield and stays deeper than the other midfielders. | | | |
|
| 29-Aug-08 07:53
guest 202.89.183.212 | | | this is what Roma under Capello used. 3-4-1-2 can change into 5-3-2 while defending with 2 winger become full back. this formation requires winger with good stamina (example: Cafu and candela when they were in Roma) and great playmaker as attacking midfield(Totti). this formation is good if you want to play counter attack | | | |
|
| 03-Sep-08 09:56
guest 144.139.9.163 | | | This is a system that many teams from the former Yugoslavia used to use. Croatia used it at the 2006 World Cup. The 1 is the playmaker, who is held in high regard in the Balkans. Not as effective in recent times, but like a previous comment - good for counter-attacking football. Wingers in this formation are absolutely crucial for success | | | |
|
| 12-Feb-09 19:34
guest 220.245.72.221 | | | A solid formation which however can come under real pressure against a team using 4 at the back and pushing their fullbacks on to support their wingers. The lone wingback in the 3-4-1-2 comes under heavy pressure and the rest of the midfield must reshuffle to support otherwise things go wrong.
However, a good formation to plug and play with. Each players role is simply defined and easily picked up. | | | |
|